Contrary to reductionist narratives, we argue that spirituality is not a product of the brain but a personal experience that may be inspired—yet not generated—by neural processes. Modern technologies do not create meaning or transcendence; they can only expand the space in which a person performs acts of self-determination. Dominant approaches treat technology as a tool for optimizing cognitive functions; this perspective is rejected here as anthropologically insufficient. “Personalistic neurotechnology” is proposed as a new paradigm in which technology does not optimize the human being but serves freedom, reflectivity, and the capacity for self-transcendence. The key question shifts from “how to improve the brain?” to “how to avoid losing the person by working with the brain?”. Neuroplasticity is not merely a mechanism of adaptation; it is a condition for the possibility of spiritual development, provided it is integrated into the act of conscious experience. The authors propose using VR devices as a “laboratory of meaning,” BCI as a “mirror of attention,” QEEG as a “map of existential tensions,” and simulators as “inspirers of action.” These are not tools for changing the person, but for enabling an encounter with oneself. This approach transcends reductionism, integrates theory with experience, introduces a new paradigm, and advances contestable yet generative theses with practical potential. Spirituality is not merely a state of consciousness but a process enacted through committed action. Technology becomes a “catalyst of meaning,” objectifying the subjective effort of decision-making and supporting the integration of the compositum humanum (spirit and body), while safeguarding subjectivity and fostering spiritual sensitivity
Presentation Spirituality is not a brain function: Towards a personalistic neurotechnology of experience – between neuroplasticity and transcendence.